ONE MAY hear today that it
 is impossible to experience the Dark Night of the Soul as a Magician or
 Theurgist, who contrary to a genuine Mystic supposedly doesn’t renounce the 
material world. However, my own experience and the experiences of other initiates proves 
beyond any doubt that it is possible and even constitutes a requirement to become a successful 
Magician or Adept. Thus a Magician, as well as the Mystic, is capable of experiencing the Dark Night of the Soul; all 
genuine Hermetic initiation creates that effect. I have had several in the past 
and will probably have several more in the future. 
However, I wouldn’t, as often is seen in discussions, 
equate the Dark Night with depression per se as it is the direct effect 
or consequence of initiation and spiritual pursuit, not simply the result of coping with the general hardships of life. Thus one has to separate clinical depression and ordinary or mundane melancholy from the apparent melancholy or frustration affected by the Dark Night of the Soul.
All spiritual paths and the followers thereof
distance themselves from the material world to a certain extent, Theurgy
 as well as Mysticism. Perhaps the modern or post-modern image of the Theurgist (such
 as in Neo-Paganism) klings to the material world, but if you look at 
the ancient Theurgists, such as the pagan neo-platonists (who invented the 
term) they certainly didn’t follow the path of wordly matters. I doubt 
that they themselves (i.e. the neo-platonists) made this post-modern 
dichotomy between Mysticism and Magic. The
 reconstructed “paganism”  of today is not the paganism of the ancients, 
such as the Hellenistic neo-platonists. 
Thus the path of Theurgy and 
Alchemy is about “leaving the material and searching the spiritual” in a
 gradual ascension. The Dark Night, which is experienced along this path
 (to test one’s commitment) is about feeling being renouced by God, the 
experience of lost contact or communication with the Higher Self (or 
with the Holy Guardian Angel for that matter), the feeling of being alone in the 
spiritual plane, a spiritual void; loosing your motivation of pursuing 
the Great Work. Oftentimes one looses focus from the spiritual and start 
to kling to the material; a species of renouncement of the spirit. It is
 the counter initiatic force which drags one back to the material; it is
 a counter-force necessary for the refinement of the soul.
The very essence of the Dark Night of the Soul is the process of first gaining connection and communication with the divine and then to lose it. Thus, this process may be likened to losing a lover or friend, a true crisis of a spiritual nature. Everline Underhill wrote a very good definition in her book Mysticism:
The very essence of the Dark Night of the Soul is the process of first gaining connection and communication with the divine and then to lose it. Thus, this process may be likened to losing a lover or friend, a true crisis of a spiritual nature. Everline Underhill wrote a very good definition in her book Mysticism:
The ‘Dark Night of the Soul,’ once fully established, is seldom lit by visions or made homely by voices. It is of the essence of its miseries that the once-possessed power of orison or contemplation now seems wholly lost. The self is tossed back from its hard-won point of vantage. Impotence, blankness, solitude, are the epithets by which those immersed in this dark fire of purification describe their pains.
Some post-modern neo-pagans hold that the Christian and Neo-Platonic division between Spirit and Matter is a faulty one, that everything belongs to the whole, that matter is equally spiritual as Spirit. These voices dispute an apparent dualism imposed by the idea of a spiritual ascension, such as expressed in traditional Hermeticism and Qabalah.
For
 me “spirit” and “matter” are simply two designations of two opposite 
poles on a contiuum of frequencies which we may refer to as “substance”.
 There is only one substance which transcends the duality of matter and 
spirit, yet there is a difference of quality between the finest segment 
of substance (i.e. “spirit”) and the coarsest (“matter”), although both 
partake of the same ALL. Alchemy is about changing of the frequency of 
vibration from coarse to fine, or the reverse. However, the Adept knows that spirit is above matter in a hierarchical order. Spiritual development for
 me is evolution of consciousness which entails the raising of the 
vibratory pitch gradually. The
 Great Work is about spiritualisation of matter, i.e. not to abandon matter 
but to live in it according to spritual principles, not materialistic 
and wordly. An Adept is not a man or woman of this saturnine world; he 
may rule it but he is a child of the Sun, of the Solar World. In a way, 
the Children of Key XIX of the Tarot reflects the stature of true Adepts.
The Eastern principle of Maya, or the
 sense of illusion, only concerns the reduction of existance to what is tangible, 
denying the spirit behind the matter. An Adept doesn’t deny the 
existence of matter but he or she sees it as the outward expression of spirit. 
As an Adept one tries to raise oneself from the purely Saturnine bodily 
existance and to awaken the Solar body within oneself. The restoration, or 
Tikkun ha-Ohlam, is about raising the sparks from the entrapment of 
fallen matter and to retreive them back to their source in the Light. 
Tikkun ha-Ohlam according to Isaac Luria and Nathan of Gaza epitomize the goal
 of the Great Work.
The original question was if the Dark 
Night of the Soul phenomena can also be applied to Theurgy and Magic. 
Well, I guess it depends upon which perspective you have on matter. One that recognises that spirit pervades matter and is the source behind
 it – the one that advocates a “Path of Return” to a more primordial 
state – surely can incorporate a Dark Night. But if one’s spirituality 
is matter-based, if it doesn’t entail sacrifice and renouncement of 
purely materialist pursuits (such as wordly power, social standing and 
riches) perhaps one may escape the Night. Thus the question is not a 
dichotomy between “mysticism” and “magic” but rather between one type of “magic” and another type of “magic”.
The traditional view on Theurgy has its basis in Neo-Platonism, which (through its theory of emanation) in fact incorporates the belief in ascension and gradual purification onto spirit. This is also the doctrine of the Holy Qabalah; the Tree of Life is a species of a Jacob’s Ladder, which initiation tries to emulate. That is why the Dark Night of the Soul is a very real experience in a Golden Dawn initiatory context.
The traditional view on Theurgy has its basis in Neo-Platonism, which (through its theory of emanation) in fact incorporates the belief in ascension and gradual purification onto spirit. This is also the doctrine of the Holy Qabalah; the Tree of Life is a species of a Jacob’s Ladder, which initiation tries to emulate. That is why the Dark Night of the Soul is a very real experience in a Golden Dawn initiatory context.
Some clarifications (2014-06-06)
I believe that some clarifications are due because of some possible misunderstandings made by Frater Barrabbas regarding what I wrote in the above paragraphs. I regard the experience of the Dark Night to be a integrated and necessary part of intitiation, and the outcome of the disintegration of the component parts of the initiate or solve phase
 of initiation; the alchemical nigredo. It is also a 
recurring phenomenon, as night follows day, and becomes day again after 
night, etc.; the alchemical process is a repeated circulation of solve et
 coagula. 
But the loosing of faith is unmistakable in this natural process – however, it doesn’t have to be that one looses faith in Godhed per se, but it may be “limited” to loosing one’s faith in the initiatory path, in the system in which one is working, a loosing of faith in the tradition that you are adhering to – i.e. one may loose one’s faith in the “religion” without loosing one’s faith in the spiritual dominion or God.
There is also the phenomenon of losing one’s faith in oneself as an initiate, the reduction of one’s own worth as a spiritual person; the feeling of being unworthy as an Adept which makes it akin to depression or melancholy, but still being induced by the spiritual pursuit and initiatory process itself. Perhaps the mystic and magician experiences a somewhat different Dark Night, because the initiatory path is not only based on faith alone, but also on empirical experience. But it is possible to loose one’s faith in or sense of the meaning of it all; one may ask oneself: “Is it worth all the effort and all the sacrifice?”
With detachment or renounciation of the material I actually refer to the life of wordliness and the life of the profane, not the reduction of the worth of matter itself or the elements themselves; when you enter the path of initiation you have to leave your old life behind, sacrifice what you have gained before, what is considered to be valuable in the consensus mind of the profane. To live a spiritual life is not to live a mundane and wordly life; it is a life subjected to higher principles than that of money, riches and wordly power.
Initiates are seldom successful in the eyes of the profane, although the initiate may be very satisfied with his or her life regardless. It is because the initiate denounces the limited worldview of the materialist; he or she doesn’t measure success with the contents of one’s wallet, or the social standing, or how many “likes” one receive on Facebook. The path of the initiate is not the path of egotism or petty prestige; although the initiate still has a functioning ego or self, it has to be subjected to the principles of the Higher Self.
Quite often the initiate may become shunned or feared because he or she has choosen a different path of life with entirely different values, which makes him or her dangerous because he or she is a threat to the current world order. Initiates are radical and by their very nature subversive, however not necessarily consciously, but because they are not any longer part of the general paradigm of their times.
I wonder if much of the opposition that I have encountered during the recent days against the though of the Dark Night being part and parcel of initiation is not the result of the post-modern fear of melancholy, the manic quest for happiness and success which is fed to out brains from media and Western authorities. I am not suggesting that this is a kind of fear which has motivated Frater Barrabbas to oppose my position, but perhaps some of his more zealous supporters. Post-modern neo-spirituality and self-help books is part of a general “prosperity theology” which reflects the post-modern commersialist western culture.
In our post-modern society we are taught that feelings of depression, grief and sorrow is something dysfunctional and bordering on antisocial. Therefore, there is the common opinion that it is good to take medication when you are feeling low on a regular basis or during prolonged periods, so that you may return to a prosperous life as a producer and consumer. There is a common fear of the dark and night in our post-modern society as a outcome of this, as it berieves you of your expected success in life.
The initiatory process goes contrary to this general and consensual opinion; there is ebb and flow in all parts of nature – we are all mano-depressive to a certain extent, as we as microcosms reflect the fluctuations of the macrocosm. Thus the Dark Night is nothing to be shunned or avoided; rather it is to be embraced as a sign post of successful initiatory work. I have written before on the subject of depression as a way to self-knowledge. I am not advocating a romantic view on suffering; what I am saying it that Darkness cannot be avoided and has to be embraced instead of fearfully escaped to be able to be worked through.
Thus, my major point is that the Darkness of the Soul is as natural as Light or Illumination of the Soul; remember that the night is never as pitch black as just before the dawn. However, eventually the sun sets in the West and the Illumination of the soul is temporarly lost (regardless if it it induced by a loss of faith in God, in the Tradition or in Oneself), only to be regained again, and again. This is an ongoing process of cyclic development; thus the Dark Night is a companion on the path of the initiate as is the Light of Day. It is part of the ongoing natural process.
Image of the Tarot Key No. XIX ‘The Sun’ is ©Tomas Stacewicz.
But the loosing of faith is unmistakable in this natural process – however, it doesn’t have to be that one looses faith in Godhed per se, but it may be “limited” to loosing one’s faith in the initiatory path, in the system in which one is working, a loosing of faith in the tradition that you are adhering to – i.e. one may loose one’s faith in the “religion” without loosing one’s faith in the spiritual dominion or God.
There is also the phenomenon of losing one’s faith in oneself as an initiate, the reduction of one’s own worth as a spiritual person; the feeling of being unworthy as an Adept which makes it akin to depression or melancholy, but still being induced by the spiritual pursuit and initiatory process itself. Perhaps the mystic and magician experiences a somewhat different Dark Night, because the initiatory path is not only based on faith alone, but also on empirical experience. But it is possible to loose one’s faith in or sense of the meaning of it all; one may ask oneself: “Is it worth all the effort and all the sacrifice?”
With detachment or renounciation of the material I actually refer to the life of wordliness and the life of the profane, not the reduction of the worth of matter itself or the elements themselves; when you enter the path of initiation you have to leave your old life behind, sacrifice what you have gained before, what is considered to be valuable in the consensus mind of the profane. To live a spiritual life is not to live a mundane and wordly life; it is a life subjected to higher principles than that of money, riches and wordly power.
Initiates are seldom successful in the eyes of the profane, although the initiate may be very satisfied with his or her life regardless. It is because the initiate denounces the limited worldview of the materialist; he or she doesn’t measure success with the contents of one’s wallet, or the social standing, or how many “likes” one receive on Facebook. The path of the initiate is not the path of egotism or petty prestige; although the initiate still has a functioning ego or self, it has to be subjected to the principles of the Higher Self.
Quite often the initiate may become shunned or feared because he or she has choosen a different path of life with entirely different values, which makes him or her dangerous because he or she is a threat to the current world order. Initiates are radical and by their very nature subversive, however not necessarily consciously, but because they are not any longer part of the general paradigm of their times.
I wonder if much of the opposition that I have encountered during the recent days against the though of the Dark Night being part and parcel of initiation is not the result of the post-modern fear of melancholy, the manic quest for happiness and success which is fed to out brains from media and Western authorities. I am not suggesting that this is a kind of fear which has motivated Frater Barrabbas to oppose my position, but perhaps some of his more zealous supporters. Post-modern neo-spirituality and self-help books is part of a general “prosperity theology” which reflects the post-modern commersialist western culture.
In our post-modern society we are taught that feelings of depression, grief and sorrow is something dysfunctional and bordering on antisocial. Therefore, there is the common opinion that it is good to take medication when you are feeling low on a regular basis or during prolonged periods, so that you may return to a prosperous life as a producer and consumer. There is a common fear of the dark and night in our post-modern society as a outcome of this, as it berieves you of your expected success in life.
The initiatory process goes contrary to this general and consensual opinion; there is ebb and flow in all parts of nature – we are all mano-depressive to a certain extent, as we as microcosms reflect the fluctuations of the macrocosm. Thus the Dark Night is nothing to be shunned or avoided; rather it is to be embraced as a sign post of successful initiatory work. I have written before on the subject of depression as a way to self-knowledge. I am not advocating a romantic view on suffering; what I am saying it that Darkness cannot be avoided and has to be embraced instead of fearfully escaped to be able to be worked through.
Thus, my major point is that the Darkness of the Soul is as natural as Light or Illumination of the Soul; remember that the night is never as pitch black as just before the dawn. However, eventually the sun sets in the West and the Illumination of the soul is temporarly lost (regardless if it it induced by a loss of faith in God, in the Tradition or in Oneself), only to be regained again, and again. This is an ongoing process of cyclic development; thus the Dark Night is a companion on the path of the initiate as is the Light of Day. It is part of the ongoing natural process.
Image of the Tarot Key No. XIX ‘The Sun’ is ©Tomas Stacewicz.
S∴R∴ 

Inga kommentarer:
Skicka en kommentar